Search Terms: irregularities
 Full Search Query:  irregularities 
    Sort Zero Δ
  • Q Drops
  • X Posts

    •  
  • TRUTH

    •  
Q Drops: 4
Digging Options: Inactive    
TZ Select: DST: No
Calendar Select:

Visitors (last) - Minute: 11 Hour: 463 24 Hours: 7141  
2690       
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 02/11/2019 12:50:46 ID: 82893e
8chan/qresearch: 5123215
2689 
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 02/11/2019 12:50:22 ID:82893e
8chan/qresearch: 5123210
Image Name: VoterFraud.jpg
Filename: c1bf60fe3efac2a7ccd4447f0e3f99cae10f3758af66fdb55e65adf7e88e2b31.jpg

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/acting-attorney-general-and-secretary-homeland-security-submit-joint-report-impact-foreign
[Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference]
Keyword: 'Foreign'
What about Domestic interference?
>Non-Cit votes by county
>Non-Cit promo by county
>Non-Cit org by county
>Targeted districts breakdown by 'Non-Cit' data acc
>Voter irregularities [internal]
>(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) - vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no show vote SC 2019 scope case?)
Why do D's push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections?
Why do D's push for OPEN BORDERS?
Find the connection.
Sometimes a MAP helps.
What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-court/supreme-court-upholds-photo-id-voting-law-idUSWAT00940020080428
What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW?
Racist?
Voter suppression of minority vote?
When is an ID required?
Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D's?
Does the argument 'A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote' suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID?
When is an ID required?
Which minorities are they referring to?
(illegal immigrants?)
Logical thinking.
If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit?
Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article92593512.html
Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past?
If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent 'minorities' from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite?
Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article215247000.html
Why do D's want POWER at all costs?
One example above.
Logical thinking.
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.
Q


Image Name: Drr-_hrXcAEV77j.jpg
Filename: 4458313fc2d1ca66feb5eaf6fe6f885669cef5c48cef59d7a0b05bbf8a1ca903.jpg

Image Search Tags:

>>5123210
2689       
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 02/11/2019 12:50:22 ID: 82893e
8chan/qresearch: 5123210
Image Name: VoterFraud.jpg
Filename: c1bf60fe3efac2a7ccd4447f0e3f99cae10f3758af66fdb55e65adf7e88e2b31.jpg

Image Search Tags:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/acting-attorney-general-and-secretary-homeland-security-submit-joint-report-impact-foreign
[Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference]
Keyword: 'Foreign'
What about Domestic interference?
>Non-Cit votes by county
>Non-Cit promo by county
>Non-Cit org by county
>Targeted districts breakdown by 'Non-Cit' data acc
>Voter irregularities [internal]
>(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) - vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no show vote SC 2019 scope case?)
Why do D's push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections?
Why do D's push for OPEN BORDERS?
Find the connection.
Sometimes a MAP helps.
What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-court/supreme-court-upholds-photo-id-voting-law-idUSWAT00940020080428
What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW?
Racist?
Voter suppression of minority vote?
When is an ID required?
Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D's?
Does the argument 'A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote' suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID?
When is an ID required?
Which minorities are they referring to?
(illegal immigrants?)
Logical thinking.
If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit?
Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article92593512.html
Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past?
If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent 'minorities' from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite?
Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article215247000.html
Why do D's want POWER at all costs?
One example above.
Logical thinking.
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.
Q
2490       
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 11/12/2018 12:36:45 ID:
8chan/patriotsfight: 464
FAKE NEWS > [optics] 'FALSE' majority > BLUE WAVE
BLUE WAVE [optics] > No Voter Irregularities > Nothing to See Here
FAKE NEWS > Voter Irregularities Challenge > CONSPIRACY
Q
780       
Q !UW.yye1fxo 02/16/2018 17:58:54 ID:
8chan/greatawakening: 97
“There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity,” Rosenstein said. “There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.”

Future proves past:

In an effort to preserve the integrity of all U.S. elections, as ordered by the President of the United States, after an extensive investigation in select counties (the ‘sampling’), the DHS has concluded that while Russian entities (as outlined within SC Mueller’s investigation were complicit in attempting to undermine the presidential election of 2016) had no direct impact or bearing on the outcome of the presidential election, nor were any U.S. person(s) knowingly part of such an attempt to sabotage as it relates to the Russian investigation, U.S. and other foreign entities (as further described within DHS[XXXX]), acting outside of Russian agents, did attempt on numerous occasions, and were successful, in interfering w/ the presidential election of 2016, senate elections of [x, y, z], [x] elections, whereby several million of illegal, non-resident ballots (the “irregularities”) were counted, while legal ballots were improperly tabulated and/or intentionally mishandled. We believe these actions were a coordinated attack against the democracy of our country.

The DHS will be submitting a final report to the WH/DOJ/other state and local agencies outlining our findings as early as March [ ], 2018. While this report only encompasses a sampling of twenty-two (22) counties across the U.S., it is strongly suggested, based on the evidence provided, that a mandated countrywide investigation begin under the recommended US50-EIC guidelines as set forth in Section VII of the final report. Furthermore, based on our immediate findings, we recommend the adoption of 8(E)(F)(G)(H) be made immediately to combat sources & methods currently being deployed to …………………………..

The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.
Page build time: 0.09417 seconds